Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XSB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 15:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] XSB

This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, it's about a single fantasy football league with no claims of notability (and I don't even know how a fantasy sports league could be notable). Only google results are from wikipedia mirrors. - Bobet 15:46, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• DELETE - so let me get this straight. They set up a fantasy football league, with a whopping great 10 teams, and then think its Wikipedia worthy? Well, listen, I've been running a football tipping competition since 1991 and we've had up to 40 people involved. We even put money in and you can win quite a lot if you win (note: this is legal where I live, so don't worry about that), and the way that we do it is unique as our scoring system is different and profound etc etc. Wait on, think I should make a Wikipedia article about that? I'd be shocked if anyone voted keep on this. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 16:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn league, sport & participants. Bjelleklang 18:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable all around. Mo0[talk] 18:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Wikipedia really needs a warning page on creating new articles. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 21:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. An imaginary league with imaginary players, with no apparent reach beyond roughly ten people. The article is kind of amusing in its earnestness, though. Sawney 14:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Discounted by closing admin Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 15:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NFT. Stifle 02:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Hilarious. This should stay around just for kicks. Lighten up and have a sense of humor. It sounds factually accurate, and kind of interesting. Personally, I want to see who will win season 4. BarryManil0w 01:25, 22 December 2005 (EST)

Discounted by closing admin Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 15:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep This page has been on Wikipedia long enough that it should just stay. Besides, this league sounds far more fascinating than the PAC 10. SnyGuy 18:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Discounted by closing admin Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 15:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.