Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wroon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was BJAODN. Mailer Diablo 12:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wroon

Possibly the finest candidate for BJAODN I've evr seen. Impressive, but delete to BJAODN. ES2 17:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• Archive and Delete per nominator - hillarious BigDT 18:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN somebody put way too much time into this. Dspserpico 19:01, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN Funny, but no. SCHZMO ✍ 19:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - it's very, very good tho'....Ac@osr 20:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN User:Dchelson did quite the job on this bad boy. -- Kicking222 20:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Store forever - but not in the mainspace :) Is anyone here active on Uncyclopedia? Would this be appreciated there? Haukur 22:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Hard to tell. But the whole point of BJAODN is the storage of things that don't belong in mainspace but are far too funny to remove from the site entirely. Confusing Manifestation 01:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN, you really have to admire the effort... Usrnme h8er 02:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN or transwiki to Uncyclopedia. Photos, even. AnonEMouse 13:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Transwikification (or transunning, as they prefer) to uncyclopedia is impossible due to license incompatibility. Stifle (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Archive and delete as per nomination. Agree that this a very fine piece of BJAODN. --BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 16:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.