Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Wide Wrestling Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – Robert 00:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NWA Ohio

Delete DarknessProductionsInc 22:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup as historical reference. Harro5 23:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comments and vote: Firstly, the listed is a redirect to the actual article being debated, at World Wide Wrestling Alliance. Secondly, the nomination gives no reason why the article should be deleted. Keep. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This redirect is completely OK. If you have a problem with the article it points to, nominate that and state your reasons. Sandstein 06:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Talk Hektor 16:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World Wide Wrestling Alliance

There's been no activity with the page DarknessProductionsInc 18:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep invalid reason for deletion. These strange deletion attempts seem to involve some content dispute. If you think the content of the page is wrong, change it! Sandstein 18:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. 1. 'No activity' is not on itself ground for deletion; at best it can be a counter-counterpoint when deletion is proposed on quality grounds, and there is a keep vote because it could be improved; even in such a case it's still just about the weakest of arguments. 2. There isn't even a lack of activity; last edit was 2 1/2 months ago. Last major edit (including a real edit war) 5 months ago. That's not by any stretch long for a Wikipedia article. Special:Ancientpages gives the articles longest not edited (including minor edits); the 1000 pages with least activity have not been edited for over 1 1/2 years. This article didn't even exist at the time. - Andre Engels 09:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Sandstein Hektor 16:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.