Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Series Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 15:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World Series Wrestling

International Assault article has been deleted, therefore this article serves no purpose Normy132 03:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment why does it follow that the article "serves no purpose"? Not a great article perhaps, but why is WSW to be deleted because one promotion was deleted? --Ogdred 03:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Because that is all WSW ever did. If the promotion only promoted one show and that show has been deemed worthy of being non-notable, why should the promotion be any more notbale thatn the show it promoted? Normy132 04:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. RobJ1981 06:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete given that its notability rests solely on something whose notability was insufficient for inclusion. Looks like wrestlecruft to me. Guy 13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I'm detecting a bit of sour grapes here. A quick trip through the (hist) shows that the nominator was the primary editor for this page. It sounds to me that Normy was on the losing end of a AfD debate for the International Assault page, and has decided that it logically follows that WSW is non notable too. I don't agree. Might I suggest that you could combine the old information from the International Assault article into this one, and create one good article from two incomplete ones? --Roninbk 14:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Robinbk. The nom has given no reason to delete here, except the precedent set on a now-deleted article. Ogdred 22:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • "Holy typo, Batman..." --Roninbk 08:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
    • No time for apologies, old chum. We must thwart some criminals. --Ogdred 02:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Daniel Olsen 06:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• I am withdrawing my AfD. Roninbk raises a good point. Normy132 02:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.