Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Peace Plan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as requested by creator. Chick Bowen 01:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World Peace Plan

Original research. The author stated that this article would have been deleted once a suitable home for it is found, but it should be deleted from the main article space in the meantime. - Liberatore(T) 16:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. "Research" is a kind word for it. Flapdragon 16:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Its a good idea though. We came up with something similar at the pub yesterday. --Ezeu 16:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete OR + nonsense :) The authors should get their own wiki to discuss this, not use wikipedia. MLA 16:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Well, if it's going to be deleted eventually, I think we should oblige them and save them the bother.--み使い Mitsukai 16:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:OR Avi 22:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. Entire arguement seems to boil down to "war will go away if we can get refugees to feed themselves." Or OR at best. Ergot 23:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as OR.Blnguyen 00:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR, and offer article's creator a Rubber_Biscuit. Barno 00:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Pavel Vozenilek 02:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'm the author of this wiki and I've moved it to http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/world_peace_plan/world_peace_plan.cfm If you think the argument is so nonsensical why don't you contribute this much needed sense? And if you think this is a in need of better research why don't you contribute some? Geoinline

I already contributed everything that I have to offer to the World Peace Plan on this AfD page. I am not interested in contributing to the article itself as it is far outside of my interests and areas of expertise (I am mostly interested in writing bios of West African political figures). Furthermore, anything that I might contribute to said page would almost certainly be deleted as vandalism, as it would begin with "This proposal is unworkable because...". At any rate, the author of the article asked for it to be deleted, which I beleive is grounds for speedy deletion. Ergot 19:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

That is indeed a criteria for speedy deletion (G7). But, why bother? As you noticed, Wikipedia still lacks coverage of important areas... - Liberatore(T) 00:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.