Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Beavers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. However, depending on how the final decision concludes at Wikipedia:Deletion_policy/Local_politicians, it may be appropriate to recreate the article either in whole or as a redirect. Rossami (talk) 07:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] William Beavers
This short-short stub reads "William Beavers is a Chicago Alderman." End of stub. How is notability being illustrated in this article and what makes it worthy of inclusion here on Wikipedia? Should it be kept or deleted? GRider\talk 16:41, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- See also: Wikipedia:Deletion_policy/Local_politicians.
- Delete, as per my previous votes on these. Megan1967 23:52, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect or expand. Meelar (talk) 04:24, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: not an article. Willing to reconsider if expanded. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:46, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Chicago aldermen. See also Wikipedia:Deletion_policy/Local_politicians. Android79 00:52, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect - keep the redirect - David Gerard 12:51, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence found that he meets the recommended criteria for inclusion of biographies. Rossami (talk) 06:24, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. No eveidence of notability. Indrian 04:31, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. (1) Local politicians aren't inherently notable, and there is no evidence of notability provided in the article; (2) It is marginally more than a sub-stub. It is most likely that a person arriving at this article will already know that Beavers was a Chicago alderman, and be exasperated with Wikipedia for wasting his time. In cases such as this, redlinks are superior to sub-stubs. --BM 21:13, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.