Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Chapman Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash^talk 01:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] William A. Chapman Elementary School

Non notable elementary school Dismas|^(talk) 12:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete agreed. Barnstar to Dismas. Dunc|☺ 14:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Delete--Isotope23 14:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Proto t c 15:15, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Vsion 15:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Schools are no more notable than apartment buildings. Bunchofgrapes 18:30, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all non-notable elementary schools. TheMadBaron 19:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for the reasons provided by Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Silensor 19:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. No basis for deletion. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, schools are notable, bad faith mass nomination. -GregAsche (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Bad faith mass nomination.--Nicodemus75 15:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Please do not do this again. CalJW 22:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, schools are notable, bad faith mass nomination - Wikipedia is not paper. Who gave Dismas his janitorial barnstar??? Unwarranted time wasting effort to remove all elementary and middle schools from Wikipedia. KillerChihuahua 23:28, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep, useful sub-page of Miami-Dade County Public Schools, good base for growth Kappa 00:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, schools are not inherently notable. Lord Bob 01:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep article about verifiable public institution and censure nominator for disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. --Gene_poole 04:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Its that simple. Vegaswikian 06:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No notability established. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 07:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Just to discoutrage this kind of mass nomination. It is bringing us nowhere. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:04, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for the same reason listed by Sjakkalle. -Parallel or Together? 07:27, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete --redstucco 09:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: non-notable grade school. Jonathunder 19:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Yellow-pages entry on non-notable grade school. Cmadler 12:15, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - it clearly says that it is a school in the title. --Celestianpower ^hab 17:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per every reason I've given on similar articles. I'm tired of retyping the same crap over and over.Gateman1997 21:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • No one is forcing you to. Please feel free to stop at any time.--Nicodemus75 21:21, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Please refrain from personal attacks.Gateman1997 21:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Please re-read WP:NPA and point out any personal attack I have made.--Nicodemus75 21:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
        • You're attempting to intimidate users off of school AFD votes... that is a personal attack. Might I also suggest you read WP:CIVIL.Gateman1997 22:12, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
          • No I am not attempting to "intimidate" anyone. There is no personal attack whatsoever as defined by WP guidelines. You stated you were "tired of retyping the same crap over and over" to which I recommended that you stop doing so if you are tired of it. Please do not invent personal attacks that do not exist. Try reading WP:FAITH.--Nicodemus75 22:25, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
            • When it comes to schools WP:FAITH died a long time ago. The best we can hope for is that people will keep this WP:CIVIL. Gateman1997 01:54, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
              • You would know best. Perhaps you should go back to authoring articles on schools you know do not exist.--Nicodemus75 02:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neutrality^talk 21:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep school. --rob 01:48, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable G Clark 01:58, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep schools. ··gracefool |☺ 19:09, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete yet another non-notable schoolbot article. No interest outside of its neighborhood, really. --Calton | Talk 01:55, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I see no good reason for deleting it. --Andylkl ^(talk) 16:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Like all the others, concise and encyclopedic. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 17:05, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. This is a fine small article. I look forward to reading who it was named after, and why. Unfocused 21:21, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.