Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 22:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wiles

A nice story of an ordinary family living in the UK. Doesn't assert the notability of the family in question. Doesn't exactly fall under A7 either, I think, because it is about a bunch of people, not just a person. Mysid 14:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep this completely remade article. –Mysid 14:03, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - NN. It's just that, an ordinary family, nobody of real importance. -^demon 14:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• nn - either delete or, perhaps, redirect to the extremely notable Andrew Wiles. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:04, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I do hope Paul Wiles is over his accident but this is really blog stuff. Keresaspa 15:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or userfy if the user wants it. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 16:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Keep UncleG's New! IMPROVED! version. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 11:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

• RobertG was on the right track, but hadn't gone far enough. Deletion wasn't the way to fix the problem with this article, which was an unsourced firsthand personal history of a person who failed to satisfy the Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion of biographies by a wide margin. Turning it into a family name disambiguation article, like the many other such articles we have, was. Keep. Uncle G 17:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the disambig. Brilliant work. BD2412 T 17:33, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as it is now a dab page. / Ezeu 03:36, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Uncle G's new page. All credit to Uncle G for being bold. Stifle 23:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Change my vote to keep. Great work. Keresaspa 14:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.