Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii elbow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. W.marsh 19:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wii elbow

Wii elbow (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

A pseudo-medical "diagnosis" and a neologism. Kafziel ^Talk 19:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete as Original Research. As this shows, this article was once speedily deleted as being patent nonsense. However, I say we let this AfD stand until the time limit is up (unless we can get a WP:SNOW). After this AfD passes, I say we need to either protect the article page to prevent recreation or keep the page as a redirect to the Wii article itself. While there've been enough people injuring themselves playing the Wii for it to be notable, it certainly doesn't deserve an article as the injuries to date have not been limited to repetitive stress injury OR elbows in general. Cheers, Lankybugger 20:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to Tennis elbow. Caknuck 20:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

There's nothing to merge. Don't be fooled by the picture of an elbow and the supposed sources (the first is just a recap of the second, which in turn isn't meant to be a serious medical entry.) See WP:NEO. Kafziel ^Talk 20:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Just like my last vote, I call for a Merge and Redirect to repetitive stress injury. --Dennisthe2 22:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete I actually agree, as per the WP:NEO article. Maybe through a small statement into the article on Nintendo Wii, because it is a prevalent injury. -- JE.at.UWO^U|_T22:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to repetitive strain injury (repetitive stress injury is a redirect page). The injury is real, but not distinct enough for its own article. Link repetitive strain injury and Wii articles. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.