Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiganburger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wiganburger

Non-notable dish? Prod was contested on User talk:MER-C#Wiganburger. MER-C 10:02, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• Extremely nn. Delete as above unless notability can be asserted. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 10:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, definitely non-notable dish, it seems like it's some home-made burger. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 10:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Notability isn't even relevant. The article cites no sources, and I can find no sources that document the existence of any such thing. It's unverifiable. (At least Parmo#References has something, even if not very much.) Delete. Uncle G 11:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Has a ring of plausibility, but also has the ring of OR and things made up in school one day. Cain Mosni 11:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - complete bollocks. Made up in school one day. BTLizard 14:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 18:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Uncle G. And I don't trust anyone who can't spell "potato". wikipediatrix 13:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.