Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiteness Elementary School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc (?) 21:36, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Whiteness Elementary School
Looks like a hoax Whiteness Elementary School + Iraq Gives 0 Google hits --JAranda | watz sup 21:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- delete it is a hoax so please stop creating these also the user that made it has been blocked before Yuckfoo 22:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --JJay 22:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete another school hoax. --rob 22:09, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - hoax. Real school name would include Arabic presumably. --MacRusgail 22:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Too bad this school isn't real. The article contains more information than 99% of the school articles presently here. Denni☯ 04:32, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep/Expand if it actually was real. Apparently every school in the Universe is notable apparently, and this one actually would have a reason for being notable. Until the School people build this one though, Delete.Karmafist 06:12, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this apparent hoax. I suspect this article has been created to make a point.--Nicodemus75 07:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- it does not really prove a point unless the point is that we delete hoax articles which we should do Yuckfoo 16:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, the last major school hoax I'm aware of, was to prove a point. It was designed to show how, wikipedia was so pro-school, even a fake school would be included. It backfired, by showing that we can keep real schools, and still delete fake schools. A hoax hurts everybody, but mostly the reputation of the person involved. So, I can see why anybody doing another hoax would wish to remain anonymous. --rob 20:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oh NOES! Teh reputation was harmed! ;) just kidding.Gateman1997 21:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, the last major school hoax I'm aware of, was to prove a point. It was designed to show how, wikipedia was so pro-school, even a fake school would be included. It backfired, by showing that we can keep real schools, and still delete fake schools. A hoax hurts everybody, but mostly the reputation of the person involved. So, I can see why anybody doing another hoax would wish to remain anonymous. --rob 20:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if infact a hoax. Though I fail to see what point is trying to be made if it is a hoax. Come to think of it why would anyone make a hoax school in the first place.Gateman1997 18:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps moments before close the creator will rewite the entire article, to be about an entirely different school, in a different place, with a similiar name, but insist they always meant the different place, but were just wrong with the "particulars" (like last time). --rob 19:15, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- That would be quite a nefarious turn of events. Any such user should be lashed with a salmon. Gateman1997 19:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps moments before close the creator will rewite the entire article, to be about an entirely different school, in a different place, with a similiar name, but insist they always meant the different place, but were just wrong with the "particulars" (like last time). --rob 19:15, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as an apparent hoax. Creating these sort of articles is the lowest form of vandalism there is. Silensor 21:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax. No Google hits outside Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 23:45, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
