Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where The Dogs Roam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. alphaChimp^(talk) 01:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Where The Dogs Roam

Seems like a hoax (WP:HOAX); a Google search of "where the dogs roam" and Snowden turned up only about 3 results, which is far less than you'd expect if the article was true. In addition, it was created by the user, who has the article's contents as his userpage - see WP:VAIN. Crystallina 02:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nn AdamBiswanger1_{R.I.P. Steve Irwin} 03:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not necessarily a hoax, as the author never asserts that any of the 44+ volumes "written" were ever published. Without such an assertion, however, not notable (and not verifiable either) by definition. --Shirahadasha 04:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Not neccesarily a hoax, I know enough great books that have absolutely no web presence. It's the quality of the links you do get that counts. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There's a single ref at mandy.com to Where the Dogs Roam (Short Film) Casting: Actor Actress jobs so perhaps not hoax although 44 vols in a year is pretty futuristic. Non-notable. Dlyons493 Talk 08:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete apparently unpublished book that comes nowhere near the notability requirements for books. -Elmer Clark 23:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.