Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westgate Mall (Fairview Park)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 00:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Westgate Mall (Fairview Park)

In the past few months, we have deleted tons of mall articles. This one should not be an exception. Part of the TrackerTV Watchlist Cleanup TRKtv (daaaaah!) 02:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Malls should be evaluated on their individual characteristics. In this case, references include a newspaper article at http://www.westlifenews.com/2005/06-01/westgate.html , as well as deadmalls.com --Eastmain 02:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I haven't made up my mind yet whether this is actually notable or not, however, intentional or not, the nominator's comment makes it seem like he/she believes all mall articles should be deleted. As Eastmain said, they should only be deleted if there is no claim of notability. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 02:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. There is no reason to delete this article. I would recommend that its content include cited references, however. --DangApricot 02:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable because of its history, almost ancient as malls go. Realkyhick 03:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Notable history when it mentions that it was among the "first postwar suburban retail centers with department store anchors in the United States" --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 19:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Notable because of its history and references. In addition, most mall articles were/are not this detailed and sourced. Finally, no valid reason for deletion has been presented. It has already been noted, but I think it should be reiterated: each article should be considered on its merits; in the case of bundled nominations, criticism of one article should apply equally to all. Black Falcon 02:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - article claims notability and has references. Mathmo ^Talk 05:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Unlike Stephenville Mall, this article suggests notability backed by reliable sources. (jarbarf) 19:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.