Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wembley F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep - no delete votes, nomination withdrawn by User:JzG. -- Francs2000 22:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wembley F.C.
Stub article on non-league football team. No known connection with Wembley Stadium. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 19:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- I was about to say "rubbish that's June Whitfield's club", but that's Wimbledon F.C....
Weak Delete as it seems non-notable but I don't know that much about football-- Change vote to keep following small expansion. -- Francs2000 21:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC) - Such a club exists in London. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Siva1979 (talk • contribs).
- Weak keep. A minor club, admittedly, but many other articles about English football clubs at the same level exist. My own personal threshold of notability would be a club senior enough to take part in the FA Cup, which Wembley passes. Qwghlm 21:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a notable club. Carioca 21:30, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. We have articles on most non-league clubs above level 10 or so, and the fact that it's a stub is irrelevant as there's plenty more that can be written about them. See F.C. United of Manchester or AFC Wimbledon for examples of good articles on English non-league clubs. Image:Yemen flag large.png CTOAGN (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- For values of "good" which may include footiecruft :-) But OK, I am happy to put my hands up to a bad call. If any passing admin wants to close this early I'd not argue. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:14, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.