Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webgm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete userfication is not exactly called for, this is not a biography or user profile. W.marsh 17:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Webgm

Does not provide evidence that is statisfies WP:WEB. Unable to locate any evidence via cursory web search. Always happy to have further information demonstrating notability. brenneman^(t)(c) 11:03, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

I nominate a related page; copy of article:

• WebGM

Weregerbil 15:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete can't find anything with google either. Weregerbil 15:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, article says it's not up yet. WP:NOT a crystal ball... --SarekOfVulcan 23:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Following a question regarding changing the focus from the website to the parent organisation, I'd suggest user-if-ication rather than deletion. I'm tempted to do it myself and speedy-close this, but am treading lightly for the last thirty hours of my rfa! If/when it is done I'll work with the author to see if a encyclopedic article is possible. - brenneman^(t)(c) 02:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey guys. Don't want to cause any problems here (I added the entry). Do what you need to do. I'm happy to change the entry (or have it moved to my userspace).

Cheers Waverley73 03:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.