Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web 2.1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Renata 06:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Web 2.1
Not notable Sleepyhead 09:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to have no more than trivial mentions in news sources and appears to be a protologism. Web2.0-cruft. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 11:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete 2.1 - neologism 2.1. Fails 2.1 WP:V 2.1. MER-C 2.1 11:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Is it just me, or does there seem to be a small walled garden of Emporis crap? -- Kicking222 13:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NEO. Terence Ong 14:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable. --John Seward 14:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Web 2.1 or Web 3.0 is the correct terminology, it exists now and is being further explored. Here is one citation, there are many others, try using google.com What Comes After Web 2.0? Google search Web 2.1 Google search Web 3.0 Octopus-Hands 00:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Can you provide any reference that provides support specifically to what the article actually talks about as of the current version? You know, "Coined by Emporis in 2005", "the system provider pays out revenue shares to its contributors" and all that. --John Seward 14:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or failing that redirect without any merge whatsoever to Web 2.0. A nebulous but widespread term (Web 2.0) that's being extended in even more nebulous way in one little known context by one source? No wait, maybe redirect isn't the way after all - otherwise we get redirects like "Web 2.3.0RC2 patch 2 build 669 'Triumphant Return of the HampsterDance'". --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
