Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WaterWorld Too
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Rlevse 03:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WaterWorld Too
4000 copies sold, only 496,000 short of a gold disc. Not a notable recording. Not close. Guy (Help!) 00:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Question: What is your source for sales figures? -MrFizyx 18:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment As per S.O.N.O.G.R.A.M. should really AfD all these with One Be Lo beacuse if he has notibility his albums are allowed pages no matter there current sales as per MP:MUSIC.--Dacium 04:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Artist is notable therefore his album pages should stay. --Djsasso 16:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep WP:MUSIC and WP:N, it meets these both.Tellyaddict 17:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Merge to One Be Lo as with S.O.N.O.G.R.A.M. GassyGuy 19:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to One Be Lo per GassyGuy. Notability "is not synonymous with 'fame' or 'importance'." (from WP:N) -- Black Falcon 19:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Read my comments for the nomination above as to why this should be kept. Powelldinho 23:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- COMMENT: This debate appears to be out of order. No notice of an AfD has ever been added to the WaterWorld Too page. In fact the page hasn't been edited in weeks. This is sloppy work and should be closed as keep ASAP. -MrFizyx 06:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Uh, you didn't exactly add the AfD notice to the page, and the discussion doesn't exactly appear to be weighted toward keep, so I'm not sure this is a great way to lodge your complaint. GassyGuy 08:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.