Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voirxudvel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as violations of WP:CSD#A7, no assertion of notability. Delete without prejudice; should the group in the future meet our criteria in WP:MUSIC and can back it up with reliable sources, they're more than welcome to come back. -- Merope 02:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Voirxudvel and Lilium (musician)

Voirxudvel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lilium (musician) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

multiple afd: non notable musicians; prod removed. I will also nominate one of her bandmates. Brianyoumans 02:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• I have added Lilium (musician) to this AFD. Prods have been removed there as well. Neither article has any sign of notability, but the authors are assiduous in removing speedy tags as soon as they are added. Brianyoumans 02:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as lacking notability as either WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. Second sentence of the lead paragraphs: "Voirxudvel is not famous" and "LiA is not famous" say it all really. Also note move towards userfying the pages to look like encyclopedia content...can we AfD user pages as spam or WP-is-not-your-personal-website? DMacks 03:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DMacks: inappropriate (e.g. spammy) use of user pages should be addressed via miscellany for deletion. --Dhartung | Talk 03:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Nominated. Thanks. DMacks 03:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Uncooperative editor removed speedy from the article he/she created multiple times, and has removed the Afd notice from that page as well. Replacing it now. Dekimasuよ! 14:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Just to clarify, I feel that this meets the criteria of db-band, and that speedy was never appropriately or substantively challenged. I am not suggesting a delete based on the removals themselves. Dekimasuよ! 16:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as not meeting notability requirements, note that the user uploaded two images of Mana for use on these pages and on the user page - I have orphaned and deleted them as fair use violations. --Coredesat 16:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete both. Non notable per WP:MUSIC. Both look like they fit WP:CSD#A7(band). --Seattle Skier (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all - none assert notability. In fact, they specifically deny it. --Haemo 00:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.