Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Crawford
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
[edit] Victoria Crawford
Non-notable model per WP:BIO as her only claim to fame is a modelling contract with the WWE, reads like a model's profile rather than an article. It was orginally tagged for speedy deletion under A7, but I removed the CSD tags as I felt having a contract with WWE was at least an assertion of notability. I prodded the article, the prod was endorsed, and then the prods were mysteriously removed by an anon without even an edit summary. AmiDaniel (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
No vote This person probably will be notable in the future, but is not really now. I really don't know what Wiki "policy" is on cases like this. I'm leaning toward keeping it, though.--UsaSatsui 00:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)- Delete. I forgot about the "crystal ball" thing. --UsaSatsui 21:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT a crystal ball. When she's famous, an article can be written about her. Ziggurat 00:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Ziggurat's suggestion. --Starionwolf 01:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Ziggurat's suggestion.Warhorus 02:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. Bwithh 02:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete come back in a year or two if she makes it Crazynas 02:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 02:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --JChap 02:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Stormscape 03:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Bill (who is cool!) 05:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Scientizzle 07:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:BIO criteria, per nom. --Terence Ong 08:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Ziggurat is right... --Dakart 09:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Ziggurat. --Andy123 candy? 14:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete yeh --Osbus 15:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete rewrite it when and if she is notable. HighInBC 15:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per ziggurat. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 16:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Nick C (Review Me!) 18:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Ziggurat with the word if instead of when Computerjoe's talk 20:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep There seems to be some precedent for including listings for wrestlers. See List_of_WWE_Divas, which includes Victoria Crawford,and World_Wrestling_Entertainment_roster. See also Beth_Pheonix. TruthbringerToronto 21:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wryspy 21:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment, if anyone cares, it seems Victoria Crawford is also the name of a notable basketball player in the WNBA [1] (though they are certaintly two different people, as one is African American and the other is Caucasian)--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 23:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Well in that case shouldn't Barbie Blanks page in under debate as well because her only claim to fame is being offered a developmental contract from the WWE as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Naylan (talk • contribs) 14:42, June 1, 2006.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.