Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viable Vision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Almost the entire article is just singing the praises of a company. "...takes on more adherents eventually" is probably a good argument to delete it until it has done so. -Splash^talk 20:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Viable Vision

Contested prod. Very unclear page about a new management concept bordering on a neologism. The page itself and searches all refer to Goldratt consulting as well. Delete. Dr Debug (Talk) 18:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advertisement.--み使い Mitsukai 19:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - reads like advertisement. Theory of constraints is notable; but not this application of it. ChemGardener 23:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Move into the Theory of constraints page. I started the Viable Vision article, and it's been modified a bit. Agreed that it appears to be an advertisement for a service only available through Goldratt Consulting. There is the hope that Viable Vision takes on more adherents eventually. I suggest the move into the Theory of constraints page as an example of how ToC is being applied. Jackvinson 15:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Jackvinson or delete. This is not a keep vote. Stifle 16:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.