Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verticalismus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Verticalismus

Verticalismus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. Tyrenius 00:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The art movement Verticalismus does not appear to be notable, due to the absence of multiple, non trivial references, published by reliable sources. Bus stop 03:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• delete per nom.--Sefringle 07:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as not meeting the policy on attribution; a search for sources failed to yield any reliable sources, and as such, does not seem to meet the primary notability criterion. Kyra_~(talk) 08:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no notability outside a small fan base, which does not mean that it could not be notable one day Alf photoman 14:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A google search turns up 19 results (8 unique) - not an auspicious result for a notable art form. There would appear to be mentions in some Greek newspapers, but we have no knowledge of the status of the papers or the nature of the mentions. I have asked for translations, but none has been forthcoming. Verified notability has not been established in the article, and it is up to the author to do this. I am conscious of WP:BITE, but there is also likely WP:COI here. Tyrenius 01:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Simultaneously his artwork become unique and nobody can reproduce(copy)it doesnt describe an "art movement" very well; unless other artists can be identified as having being called part of this movement, its a one man show. John Vandenberg 12:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all above Johnbod 03:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.