Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Finn (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Veronica Finn

Veronica Finn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Constested speedy. D-list pop tart with little past, no future, and no notability. Her 15 minutes are over and she is now selling real estate. Membership in a marginally slightly notable group does not confer notability. Does not meet WP:MUSIC or, really, even come close. (N.B.: A previous nomination was stopped due to lack of standing of nominator.) Herostratus 03:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment "D-list pop tart with little past, no future" is not appropriate and makes your POV questionable.--Dacium 03:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per the non-nasty parts of the nom, and I might argue that this is speedy-able given that it contains virtually no content.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 03:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Innosense, the music group she was a member of. The group's main claim to fame is that one of its original members was Britney Spears. --Metropolitan90 07:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Seems reasonable, perhaps merging whatever relevant material merits it.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 19:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danay Ferrer and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Latona. --Dhartung | Talk 07:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep notable by association with notable band and notable significant other of sorts. TonyTheTiger 18:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep she is notable due to being associated with Britney Spears and also being involved with Justin Timberlake. Also, Herostratus's comment "D-List pop tart with little past, no future" is inappropriate and lacks any reason and logic into why we should delete this article. After all, that comment seems to be biased. Omghgomg 05:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Are all of Spears' and Timberlake's backup dancers notable? I dunno if I necessarily agree with that line of reasoning. It is obviously unfortunate that the nom uses abusive language but the article is still delete-able...-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

• Merge with innosense and redirect--Lee Vonce 16:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Article with no outside independent references about the person. Only external link isn't even about her. Delete unless independent sources can be provided for verification and to establish she has been notably discussed in publications. Dugwiki 20:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• keep Notable. And as per Tony the T. Dwain 23:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As per Dugwiki Netuser500 00:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Blunt, but accurate. Fame by association doesn't cut it. --Calton | Talk 23:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Member of a notable band. I am not sure what is the meaning of "Her 15 minutes are over". We do not only cover currently popular performers. User:Dimadick
• Delete. Article is pure and unmitigated crap. It seems to have been written as either a joke or in bad faith. Bookishreader45 02:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep or redirect if no other reason than to negate the bad faith vote directly above. -WarthogDemon 02:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.