Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verboten

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki. -- AllyUnion (talk) 11:21, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Verboten

Dictdef. Additionally, there are problems with the content ("used half-jokingly"?). BenSamples 05:57, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I agree, it is a dicdef. I also have a problem with it saying "Today, the term is often used half-jokingly." Zzyzx11 07:42, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Wiktionary, rewrite. It's a common enough cross-over word into the English language. Google gets around 250,000 pages with English filter. Megan1967 09:32, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki as above. Radiant! 12:35, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. – flamurai (t) 17:28, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Not yet in Wiktionary. Transwiki Rossami (talk) 05:30, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• This is one of the ridiculous things I come across in Wikipedia from time to time: First the article is shortened beyond recognition so that only one sentence remains, and then it is claimed it's a "dicdef". Restore and keep. <KF> 00:28, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.