Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugmo Who
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ugmo Who
This is a contested prod. The original prod tag said, "Fanfic in development - please see WP:NOTABLE." That was removed with the rational of, "Deletion message deleted, although if not satisfied with my reasoning, you can put the message up again. UgmoWho (or DW13) is an ensemble film, a community wide animation project. It utilises the program 3d Movie Maker, or more specifically its successor, v3dmm. However, we've pushed the boundaries by providing the first ever v3dmm-CGI-AfterEffects hybrid, so it is relevant to the 3dmm Wiki. We will add a link to this wiki on the 3dmm wiki when we have screenshots." A third editor replaced the prod with a reason of "Fan Fiction. Not encyclopaedic content." I thought at this point an AFD would be better than a prod. Procedural nomination; no vote. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 16:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- comment the technology point about bringing together v3dmm-CGI-Aftereffects sounds notable to me, though I agree that the fanfic side of the article has more of a questionable notability. Perhaps an article on the hybrid, mentioning where its from and who devealoped it, rather than on the film, which is less notable? SGGH 16:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fanfic in development? Wikipedia is not a free PR wire service, not to mention WP:CRYSTAL. --Dhartung | Talk 19:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This appears to be a 3D Movie Maker movie rather than a fanfic. Technological innovation in a video game from 1995 still used by perhaps 100 people in the world is, unfortunately, not likely to be notable under any circumstances. -Elmer Clark 21:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - its crystalballing, and fails WP:RS as there appears to be no reliable sources for this. -- Whpq 21:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NOTE given no coverage by reliable sources. Even if it isn't a fanfic, Wikipedia is not a soapbox to promote your creations. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 00:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as a vanity page. Fails WP:NOTE and almost every other notability standard. --Ridesim 09:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
