Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK Copyright Service

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] UK Copyright Service

Article is an advert for a service that does not appear notable. Harris 12:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• I knew there would be some guidelines somewhere - does not appear to meet notability requirements of WP:CORP Harris 08:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesses-related deletions. -- Harris 11:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CORP as well as Wikipedia is not the yellow pages, nor is it an internet guide. --Wine Guy Talk 21:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,

• Delete as per Wine Guy. --BrownHairedGirl 08:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. They're generally accepted to be the top copyright registration service in the UK. Darksun 12:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam. Kafziel 16:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep — Results in search engines seem to confirm it's known, 18,700 on google mboverload@ 20:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom and Wine Guy --Cassavau 22:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete advertisement. A private service is hardly required to establish copyright protections, at least in the U.S, but then I don't know about the UK. --HResearcher 02:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.