Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tzveta Dmitrieva Pokrovska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was unanimous delete. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 07:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tzveta Dmitrieva Pokrovska

Non-famous person. I prodded it, but it was removed. Only claim to fame is 4th place at ISEF. BrokenSegue 21:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete They removed an undergrad article from prod? In that event, I'm girlcotting prod. Ruby 21:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. However, the claim to fame is having an asteroid named after her, which in my book is plenty to justify the removal of the {{prod}} tag. I think the process worked quite well here. An article on the asteroid itself would be more appopriate, if (as it says in the history) the asteroid folks want one. bikeable (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable undergraduate who's trying to blow her own trumpet. Masud 23:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • That's quite amusing coming from Masud Rahman. You seem to be very good at the trumpet.
    • I'd like to point out, at this point, that the article Masud Rahman was not created nor edited by me (this can be corroborated by looking at the article's subsequent AfD debate, since I was not involved in that debate in any way whatsoever), and therefore the implication above that I had vainly promoted myself in Wikipedia is utterly false. Masud 03:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Hardly notable. I know plenty of former ISEF competitors, and I don't think they should have their own Wikipedia page. Reeks of vanity. I also doubt the asteroid itself is anything notable and not worthy of a rewritten page; otherwise we'd have tens of thousands of pages on every single discovered asteroid. --Kinu 23:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Pilatus 21:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 04:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete under WP:CSD A7 and so tagged. If for some reason not speedy deleted, delete as non-notable. DES ^(talk) 16:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I think Intel International Science and Engineering Fair should contain a list of prize winners, if anyone knows where to find that. I'll remove speedy because it does assert claim of notability. enochlau (talk) 00:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.