Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Lakes Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash^talk 01:12, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Twin Lakes Elementary School

Non notable elementary school Dismas|^(talk) 12:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep Kappa 13:48, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Delete--Isotope23 14:00, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• DeleteDunc|☺ 14:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete! Proto t c 15:11, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Vsion 15:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Schools are no more notable than apartment buildings. Bunchofgrapes 18:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Silensor 19:15, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all non-notable elementary schools. TheMadBaron 19:18, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. No basis for deletion. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, schools are notable, bad faith mass nomination. -GregAsche (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Bad faith mass nomination.--Nicodemus75 15:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Bad faith? "if you think this serves no purpose I think you should also conseder deleting the other Schools Listed on the Miami-Dade School District page." - preceeding unsigned comment by Calton | Talk. --Nicodemus75 19:45, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Please do not do this again. CalJW 22:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, schools are notable, bad faith mass nomination - Wikipedia is not paper. Who gave Dismas his janitorial barnstar??? Unwarranted time wasting effort to remove all elementary and middle schools from Wikipedia. KillerChihuahua 23:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, schools are not inherently notable. Lord Bob 01:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Yellow Pages. Pilatus 01:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep article about verifiable public institution and censure nominator for disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. --Gene_poole 04:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Its that simple. Vegaswikian 06:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No notability established. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 06:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Just to discoutrage this kind of mass nomination. It is bringing us nowhere. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for the same reason listed by Sjakkalle. -Parallel or Together? 07:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete --redstucco 09:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: non-notable grade school. Jonathunder 19:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep please these are a bunch of bad faith listings Yuckfoo 01:48, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this isn't the yellowpages website.Gateman1997 20:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete All Elementary Schools may change vote --Aranda56 22:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep schools. ··gracefool |☺ 19:07, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Yet another schoolbot Yellow Pages listing. --Calton | Talk 01:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. No good reason to delete the article. --Andylkl ^(talk) 16:02, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The same admirably concise approach to stub writing. I like it. All the essentials in three sentences, with two useful links for more information. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 16:42, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Well written, formatted and referenced stub. We should be encouraging this type of participation. Unfocused 21:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.