Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trojan donkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani^talk 00:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trojan donkey

Blurb about not-notable headlines in some newspapers. No sources provided. It would be the same as to create an article on K Fed-up refering to Britney and Kevin divorce, the headline was used in yesterday's newspaper... Renata 19:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Its a genuine term. scope_creep 20:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment "genuineness" is not the issue. Notability, WP:NEO and WP:WINAD are (some of the) issue(s). Xtifr _tälk 02:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Appleseed (Talk) 20:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-encyclopedic. --Lysy^talk 20:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Note, e.g., this link [1] where a polish station complains about the use of the term to President Bush. Apparently, it did generate some press and cause some concern. --Hyperbole 21:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-encyclopedic as no evidence of widespread, substantive use; appears to be ephemeral buzzphrase/newspaper headline. News coverage/passing concern does not automatically translate to encyclopedic notability. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for every term/phrase/newspaper headline out there - Wikipedia is not a dictionary, glossary, news report archive, slang guide, buzzword clearing house etc etc Bwithh 00:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Bwithh expressed it perfectly. Xtifr _tälk 02:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the content; expand if possible, otherwise consider merging appropriately. Everyking 10:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Bwithh --khello 00:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge So if the media started calling Britney Spears "Titney", that would be worth an article? Merge only if it can be sourced, and I don't even know where. ~ trialsanderrors 11:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.