Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trixi tang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 18:07, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Trixi tang

just created by anon ip. barely legible.Dave 00:59, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to The Fairly OddParents, which has an entry for her. Joyous | Talk 01:51, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete- I'd say this is straying dangerously close to patent nonsense territory. No sane person could be expected to make sense of this miasma of misguided fancrufty enthusiasm. Reyk 01:54, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Almost incomprehensible. I could just barely understand about half of it. ♠DanMS 02:42, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to The Fairly Oddparents as per WP:FICT. The short paragraph in that article is actually understandable. On second thoughts, Delete. Capitalistroadster 04:27, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect Delete as per abovebelow. --Locke Cole ^{(talk) (e-mail)} 05:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete no point redirecting (incorrect capitalisation) and nothing coherent enough to merge. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 12:40, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, so what if the capitalisation is wrong? If we had an article with the correct capitalisation, we'd redirect to that. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:05, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
  • But it's spelled wrong, too, if the main article for the show is any indicator. It's not a double mistake that too many people are likely to make. Dave 15:18, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and send the user to public school so they can learn how to spell. --Grande 15:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Irretrievable bad Prashanthns 17:44, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - cringe! Don't you just worry about the standard of some new contributions to Wikipedia? Moriori 18:16, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep... I fixed the typos and grammar. Wikipedia is supposed to be about collaborative development, not criticizing and deleting people's hard work... Voyager640 19:05, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
  • You fixed the typos and grammar? Could have fooled me!. It's still a mess. OK, that's the criticism bit, but the collaborative bit is that I'll give it a much needed haircut. Cheers. Moriori 20:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
    • OK, I have put into some semblance of English and tidied it a bit but it is still much ado about absolutely nothing and I still say Delete. Moriori 20:35, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: No evidence that someone would repeat the misspelling and incorrect capitalization in a search to therefore need the redirect, and the article's contents are already knowable to fans of the show and unsearchable by non-fans. The bit about the origin of the character would, at best, be part of an article on the cartoon itself. In short, it is too granular and unusable. Geogre 21:07, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Joel7687 21:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.