Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor (Harry Potter) (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge. Petros471 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trevor (Harry Potter) (second nomination)

• 1st Afd — ended in a delete, but admin has rejected {{db-repost}} due to "not substantially identical to the three-word article deleted at VfD".
• Delete. I do not believe this article describes a sufficiently notable subject to merit its own article. I suggest deleting it or merging it to Minor Harry Potter beasts. — Mike • 04:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into and redirect to Neville Longbottom. (Such a redirect was suggested by several voters in the original VfD, despite the fact that there was nothing to merge.) The information would fit nicely there, and the fact that three different editors have created this page indicates that it's a reasonably likely search term. Minor Harry Potter beasts appears to document fictional species, not specific animal characters. —David Levy 05:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge & redirect, completly agree with David Levy, couldn't have put it better myself. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 05:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge & redirect. I umm..."third" David Levy. redirect to Neville Longbottom btw and not Minor Harry Potter beasts. anirudh 07:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)talk
• Merge & redirect. I umm..."forth" --mboverload@ 09:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Neville Longbottom for easy reference. Trevor's important in contact, but doesn't feature enough in the story to warrant a separate entry much. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per above. --Coredesat 10:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per above. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 23:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.