Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treasure (Pikmin)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Treasure (Pikmin)

An incomplete list of items you get in Pikmin. Of no encyclopediac value, Delete. Nifboy 07:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete insufficiently notable per nom. MLA 08:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable gamecruft. Wikipedia is not GameFAQs. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --AlexDW 17:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• ??? The list is much too long to finish in one session. I'm working as fast as I can, but the computer is two floors away from the Gamecube, and my guide is missing. I do have a tendency to include opinion without realizing it, so please by all means edit out the opinion. The only question I have is what "Insufficiently notable per nom" means and what "Non-notable gamecruft" means. Answers?--Dreyfus 18:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • It means you should move your list to Gameinfo or Wikibooks instead of Wikipedia, as it isn't considered a suitable subject for an encyclopedia. Ben Standeven 20:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• I guess this means that Wikipedia is not and never will be the sum of human knowledge. No gameFAQs, no recipes, no how-to's. How many more areas of human knowledge are disallowed? --Trinity
• Delete. I've listed the spaceship parts in most of the location articles. Vidgmchtr 05:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.