Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparent Reality Simulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Yomangani^talk 00:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Transparent Reality Simulation

tagged as copyvio, but author of the web site is the author of the article and releases under GFDL. Strong smell of vanity, no evidence of importance as yet. Guy 21:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

1. Very Weak Keep But Definite Rewrite If Kept Article is verifiable and reports cited suggest that it may be notable, though it does seem dubious at best. The copied text does however reak of vanity, so it requires a rewrite if it's kept. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c e} 00:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 16:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep, definitely rewrite. Not only is the article written from a vanity position, it's also confusingly written (or I'm just out of it today, which is also a definite possibility).Edward Wakelin 17:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Important new technology, has references to prove it. The concept is not a simple one, but that is true of lots of new technology. Do not delete just because you are confused after reading it.. Ask a question on the discussion page, and maybe the creator of the article will add clearer explanation of what confuses you.Edison 21:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.