Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsten Lilliecrona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-09 09:19Z

[edit] Torsten Lilliecrona

Torsten Lilliecrona (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not shown. Even if arguendo notable, there's no useful information here. Delete; recreate later as a proper article if in fact notable. --Nlu (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Defintely notable, but poorly presented. I'll try to add some references. Tikiwont 12:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. This was a fairly prolific actor (see the partial filmography at the Swedish Wikipedia article about him, http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsten_Lilliecrona ) and in addition the TV series where he was one of the main characters is re-run every year in Swedish television even after 40 years. (Unfortunately the Wikipedia article about the series in question is also rather poorly written, though I think it is being cleaned up now). One printed work which includes Lilliecrona is Myggans Nöjeslexikon (Myggan's Encyclopedia of Entertainment), vol. 10 (1992).--Bonadea 17:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Actually, I think Tikiwont has added enough sources to the article to prove WP:N by now :-) --Bonadea 17:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletions. -- Tikiwont 14:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• yeah its like ususall on this page.. all not american articles get deleted. dont use your power just because you want to use it for good things insted guys. /matrix17
• Keep per Bonadea. -- TexMurphy 22:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per assertions of notability by editors & offers to find references. --lquilter 02:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as currently sourced this individual meets WP:BIO.--Isotope23 14:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as-is based on references provided and the comments by Bonadea above. (jarbarf) 19:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Bonadea, definitely meets WP:BIO no questions asked. RFerreira 08:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep this page is definitely not a deletion page. /matrix17

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.