Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornavalanche

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tornavalanche

Non notable "supergroup" from members of one barely notable band and one truly non notable band: no records (well, one half single) yet Fram 13:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

(Text below was added by other users before I had the chance to finish my AfD listing, creating an editing conflict) Fram 13:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Tornavalanche qualifies for WP:BAND because they have members of notable bands and have a record out with a notable band.

Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such. Is cited in notable and verifiable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching in a particular music genre. Sources and info to come shortly, I had a bunch written but you just wasted my time.. when i tried to save the page, you had already inserted you speedy deletion, i hope you feel happy happy happy happy and happy. (Xsxex 13:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC))

Replied on Xsxex's talk page. The speedy tag was {{db-empty}}, not {{db-bio}} (it was only half a sentence long at the time). --ais523 13:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tornavalanche"

Also it passes the google test 1,320 for tornavalanche. (0.10 seconds) (Xsxex 13:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC))

• Speedy delete as non-notable band. Ifnord 13:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I don't think having members of a barely notable (if at all) qualifies in the spirit of WP:BAND. That seems to be the only hint of possible notability, so I'm sticking with delete. Wickethewok 14:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep google test, members in a barely notable but notable band Xsxex 14:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete The band is completely non-notable, and even ignoring the fact that I despise the "contains at least one member..." rule, I'm not sure why that other band (which is Tornavalanche's only assertion of notabiliy) is itself notable. Their article doesn't really convey much importance. This article, on the other hand, conveys absolutely no importance. -- Kicking222 21:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• I have to agree with Kicking222. Delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.