Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Perez Acle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Author has userfied it. -- RHaworth 22:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tomas Perez Acle
A rather average scientist, doing your average scientist's work: Giving lectures, publishing papers, talking at conferences. Nothing particularly notable. No reliable sources given except for his publications. Fails WP:BIO (actually, since I'm no expert in the field, he might pass WP:PROF without me knowing it, but the article gives no indication). Delete. Huon 07:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like his CV. --Storkk 11:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - resume. MER-C 12:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete clearly fails WP:PROF. Leibniz 21:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Didn't anyone notice that the link for the editor who created this page (User:Tomasao) is a redirect to this page? Isn't there a policy that forbids creating articles about yourself?? --141.156.232.179 19:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Only 7 publications, in at best medium-rank journals; the institute he's head of doesn't seem to be an independent institute of any obvious note, though someone who can translate the website might be useful. Espresso Addict 09:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Hi There... all of you are right... Actually is my personal page and is not more than a CV. I was creating a personal page for my user Tomasao, and suddenly I wrote Tomas Perez and I got a Baseball player page that is currently under Wikipedia. So, I thought that if a baseball player have its own wikipedia page, why not me?... certainly breaks several wikipedia "laws" and I will remove it.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.