Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Doesn't Notice

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 00:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Time Doesn't Notice

Non-notable album by non-notable band. Merge the article contents to the band page. SchmuckyTheCat 21:57, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, albums all have pages. If the band is non-notable, Vfd it. Kappa 22:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Kappa; no sense in creating double standards. Flowerparty ^talk 22:27, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Alf 13:26, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep, but really, if people can't write more than a single sentence and a list of songs why do they even bother? Do people put any effort into things they write any more? -R. fiend 14:28, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no indication of any notability or significance. Even bands which clearly meet WP:MUSIC guidelines don't automatically get articles for every album they ever released. Otherwise we would need literally tens of thousands of disambiguation pages for the many many albums whose titles match each other or match titles of much-more-famous books or movies. Barno 18:16, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.