Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Brady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was 'Delete HappyCamper 01:58, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Brady

Appears to be vanity page. While I hope that he has a great future in filmaking, at the moment he is certainly not-notable. Delete --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 00:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

NN, D. ComCat 00:45, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

• Note: there is a link from the Electric guitar page to the article, but that link clearly predates the creation of the page, and a google search reveals a much more notable Tim Brady who plays guitar. So I say delete and rewrite for other Tim Brady. StarryEyes 01:00, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
  • And there's also a link on Wikipedia:Music encyclopedia topics/43. StarryEyes 01:02, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and make disambiguation page. Real person. ♥♥purplefeltangel♥♥ 01:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

  Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Gazpacho

• A disambiguation of what? And just because something is real, doesn't automatically warrant inclusion, it needs to be notable. Delete with extreme prejudice. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
  • What's that? Notable? I don't see anything about notability. ♥♥purplefeltangel♥♥ 02:05, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
    • I sure do. —Cryptic (talk) 02:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
    • See our criteria for inclusion of biographies and our Wikipedia is not a 'phone book (i.e. it is not a directory of people) official policy. Uncle G 02:34, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
      • I've noticed a very strange quality to purplefeltangel's edits on this page, especially given her history of as a self-described deletionist. Draw what conclusions you will. StarryEyes 02:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
        • Comment: her user page has just been changed from deletionist to inclusionist. Has someone taken over her account? -- Kjkolb 04:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, even if he is a real person, I've made more short films than he has and I'm not even close to a notable filmmaker.--Isotope23 02:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, some hobbyist. Gazpacho 04:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Dottore So 10:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator. Hall Monitor 15:58, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete real person, along with 6,000,000,000 others. -R. fiend 19:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Nominator made no effort whatsoever to support this nomination. Bryan 00:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  • What would you like? A link to his non-existant imdb page? It's pretty hard to prove a negative, and JiFish's nomination is about as complete as one could expect for an article like this. —Cryptic (talk) 02:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
    • My bad on this one, ComCat's "NN, D" was a vote rather than a nomination. I'm abstaining on this one now. Bryan 03:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
    • As for what I'd like as evidence that the issue of notability has at least been examined, at the barest minimum a Google search would be nice. An IMDB search that results in no hits (or in this person's case, one hit that appears to be someone else with the same name) is evidence. Bryan 03:16, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
      • You have got to be kidding me. Why should the way I nominated the article affect your vote? --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 11:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN. -- DS1953 ^talk 06:06, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• del. does not meet wp:v, let alone wp:bio. encephalon 10:26, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Obvious. Gamaliel 18:07, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.