Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bayne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Bayne

Was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Peri as nn-bio, but does not qualify. Bringing it to AfD instead. No vote/. howcheng {chat} 18:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete 4 papers, no assertion of notability, seems to qualify as nn-bio to me. --Pboyd04 19:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable academic. Tom Harrison ^(talk) 21:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This academic does not appear to have made a notable contribution towards the understanding of his branch of philosophy as of yet. -- (aeropagitica)  22:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.