Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throat lozenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Throat lozenge. – Robert 23:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Throat lozenger

Delete. This appears to be either a hoax or a genuine misundertanding. "Lozenge" is a noun, not a verb, and refers to the cough drop's shape. Ashenai 20:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nonsense or hoax. The Lozenge article gives the actual etymology (refers to the shape of the object, not its effects) Ergot 21:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect per comments below Ergot 18:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete the text of this pointless article and redirect to throat lozenge, whose content is mirrored here, since whatever the etymological rights and wrongs, the term "throat lozenger" does seem to have some currency. It's not a a hoax. Flapdragon 21:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ashenai. --Allen 21:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to throat lozenge per Flapdragon and Mithent. --Allen 23:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to throat lozenge, because 'lozenger' is a common (mis?)pronunciation of the word 'lozenge', used by my family for example, and people could easily therefore think that the spelling is 'lozenger'. -- Mithent 23:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to throat lozenge. Haikupoet 04:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per almost everyone. Grandmasterka 02:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.