Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas W.L. Nisbett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas W.L. Nisbett

Thomas W.L. Nisbett (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The subject is a nonnotable businessman who apparently created the page himself. The article also fails WP:V as no asserted facts are sourced. Butseriouslyfolks 17:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I should have noted that this article was prodded a month ago and that the prod tag was removed by the article's creator. (My bad.) Otherwise, I would have speedied it. --Butseriouslyfolks 22:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I agree, this is just a vanity page. GhostPirate 19:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - nothing particularly notable, and unable to find any reliable sources. -- Whpq 20:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIO by end of this AfD Alf^Photoman 22:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• delete as the article says, "varied background" but unfortunately no part of it is N.DGG 04:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It is verifiable that he was the first Black priest in the Anglican Church in Bermuda and this makes him notable. There are at least 2 reliable published sources. I agree the article is not well written, but the remedy is to improve the article. NBeale 16:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Huh? I think you are confusing him with his father. There are no sources listed here. --Butseriouslyfolks 18:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.