Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The iSONEWS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Withdrawn Agent 86 01:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The iSONEWS

The iSONEWS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This article fails WP:WEB for lack of third-party coverage. As it also asserts no notability, it could be speedily deleted per WP:CSD#A7, but in view of the article's age and number of contributors, an AfD is perhaps in order. Sandstein 16:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Withdrawn in view of coverage provided below; I suggest you link to these from the article. Sandstein 17:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep WP:WEB only requires multiple non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. Multiple being more than one. [1] and [2] clearly satisfy that. While the coverage isn't extensive, it does satisfy the notability guideline.--Crossmr 17:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

  Already done.--Crossmr 17:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep subject has received non-trivial coverage by the mainstream media. Yamaguchi先生 00:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.