Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The game of inferno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 18:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The game of inferno

The game of inferno (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:NFT. Only one google hit: [1]. The only author removed prod. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 02:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable. bibliomaniac15 02:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NN --K.Z ^{Talk • Vandal • Contrib} 09:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable and Wikipedia is not for something made up in school one day. James086^Talk 11:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V and WP:NFT.-- danntm ^T _C 20:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• delete totally non-notable and unverifiable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete complete and total garbage. JuJube 10:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Inadequate references/sources. Oh, and appears to be "made up in school". WMMartin 13:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NFT just about says it all. Can't deny that "bizintigration claw pack" is my new favorite phrase, though. Did anyone notice that the author calls us all nerds at the bottom of the article? Nerds who can spell, buddy. -- Antepenultimate 02:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:NN,WP:RS PeaceNT 11:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.