Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The daily reel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The daily reel

Reads like an ad or plushy description and has little encyclopedic significance. ~ clearthought 00:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete If the claims of the article have truth then this might be notable. As it stands, though, it looks to me like a lot of hot air; but I am perfectly willing to change my vote pending a rewrite. Danny Lilithborne 00:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unencyclopedic, reads like an ad. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 01:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete This is just WP:VSCA copied from User:The Daily Reel's page ... should also AfD Jamie Patricof as part of the same self-promotion campaign (click "Half Nelson" on that page. :-) --Dennette 01:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like User:The Daily Reel's user page is also being used in violation of policy. fbb_fan 02:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs Count} 05:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per WP:WW -PEAR 06:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Wheel war? I don't get it. Mak (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete but if it is kept, move to The Daily Reel. — Gary Kirk | ^talk! 09:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - the article says the site only opened in august 2006, i say its not quite notable yet, maybe in the future. --mathewguiver 14:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mak (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Cynical 21:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 01:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Non-notable ad. Moreschi 14:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.