Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The amazing pact

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by admin Physicq210 (CSD G10). Non-admin closure of orphaned AFD per WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 06:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The amazing pact

The amazing pact (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This article is highly inconsistent with WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. John254 04:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete- It's also, I'm sure, a bunch of crap. Cantras 04:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Wow, it's so amazing that filmwriters try to write good films! -Amarkov ^blah_edits 04:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even if it were true, how are the directors basing this on? Good, bad, it's all conjecture. -WarthogDemon 05:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete and BJAODN some of this. Daniel Case 05:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 05:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Amazing - err, I mean Speedy Delete by WP:Attack, Delete by WP:BULL, WP:OR and WP:POV -- wtfunkymonkey
• comment looking at the contribution history of the article's creator, Fgdncso, I would also reccomend a banning in this case. wtfunkymonkey 05:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• [1] - vandalism to Pigeon racing
• [2] [3] [4] - vandalism to Synopsis
• [5] - blanking of Hall
• [6] [7] - user's only meaningful edits.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.