Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Underdogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Home of the Underdogs. --Deathphoenix 22:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Underdogs

Pure nonsense. Abu Badali 19:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Home of the Underdogs. While this article is nonsense, "The Underdogs" could be used feasibly to search for HotU. --Andy Saunders 20:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Underdog (disambiguation) or put a disambig on top of the HotU article. Nifboy 20:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks like a real songwriting/producing team. [1] No Guru 20:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Home of the Underdogs, as is the more common usage (at least in wikipedia) of [[The Underdogs]] --Larsinio 19:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Am I the only one who thinks this producing group is notable enough to have their own article ? To quote from the link I posted above - "The Underdogs have contributed to over 50 singles and albums that have reached Gold, Platinum, and multi-Platinum sales status, and have generated numerous Top 10 singles". I'm not sure how the article is nonsene as it seems to check out to me. Maybe it needs to be cleaned up but I'm not sure I understand this growing consensus to redirect. Maybe somebody could straighten me out ! Thanks. No Guru 20:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.