Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Revolution Smile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Yanksox 00:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Revolution Smile

Self promotion by User:Summerever, seems to be a liittle known band, Speedy deletion tags on subpage Summer Ever has been removed without comment, POV-cleanup tag on this page has also been removed without comment -- Chris 73 | Talk 02:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Chris 73 | Talk 02:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• not a little known band, but it has been fixed for a more neutral pov. thanks. --Summerever 20:38, 9 August 2006
  • It's great that the band has been covered in those publications you listed, but you need actual links to the article, or at the very least, bibliographical citations of the articles in print. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 22:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Actually, there may be some notability, but the article(s) need a rewrite at the least. -- Chris 73 | Talk 02:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom KnightLago 02:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. There may be some notability here. However, the article needs major revision to come up to standards. --Cassavau
  • Question/Comment - When things like this come up, I usually can see why. But I'm having some trouble figuring out what my fellow editors find "wrong" about this article. I did some spacing changes, but I find no issue with the content. Any suggestions? PT ^(s-s-s-s) 16:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - SPAM WilyD 13:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Meets touring requirement of WP:MUSIC as a Warped Tour band. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 15:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Pure spam, and does not pass Notability --16:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bschott (talk • contribs).
  • Keep with the information now provided on the page, I am changing my mind on the article. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 14:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Explain how this article is "spam." And it clearly passes notability just on the touring requirement alone, so why are you saying it's not notable? PT ^(s-s-s-s) 16:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete this band is not very notable, unless someone can post with support of notablity I move for delete. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 20:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I already did, they meet the touring criteria of the notability requirement. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 20:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Weak Keep Thank you Æon ^{Insane Ward} 20:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:MUSIC, now contains links to some press coverage. the wub "?!" 08:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:MUSIC through touring. --Aguerriero (talk) 22:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: external press and enough to say about them. Stephen B Streater 15:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.