Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Psychology Wiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Psychology Wiki

It fails the google test. It does not assert notability. I suspect it is vanity. WaterUrn 03:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I don't know about failing the google test (14,000 hits), but it does fail WP:WEB.--Kchase T 04:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:WEB, only 99 of the Ghits are unique. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:WEB, and anyway mostly seems to be reposted wikipedia articles (althiugh I'm not sure whether that has any relevance in AFD). --BrownHairedGirl 07:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:WEB. I also support WaterUrn's theory of this article violating WP:VAIN. Thε Halo ^Θ 11:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above and also per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. "This site aims to..." "This site is intended to slowly develop..." "is is envisaged that..." "as the intended users are..." "much greater potential for... " "is intended to eventually have link[s] to every..." "will have extensive indexing..." The article can be re-created without prejudice when the site has achieved some of its "aims," has developed as "intended", has realized some of what now is only "envisaged," has achieved some of what is now only "potential", and actually has extensive indexing. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Peephole 16:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.