This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 16:16, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Pointless duplication, and not good, of material covered in the article Alexander the Great. — Bill 19:21, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete per Bill. HyperZonktalk 20:06, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, only need one of these. Of course, if I'd seen it before VfD listing, I'd have redir'd to Alexander article, and saved all this trouble. Stan 21:29, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, duplicate article. Megan1967 23:35, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.