Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legacy of Izmir Alkansur I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 00:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Legacy of Izmir Alkansur I

Factuality of the article is very highly disputable Druworos 14:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom--Jusjih 15:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete – patent nonsense, balderdash, poppycock, hogwash, tripe (CSD G1). (Am I expressing myself clearly?) All other edits of this user (as anon and Papi Lugliano) were quickly reverted. --Lambiam^Talk 21:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and a glass of ice tea for Lambiam... for WP:COOLness. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 22:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

You don't know how cold it is over here. I'd rather have a hot chocolate. --Lambiam^Talk 23:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

This article, that whole Izmir Alkansur story, is an interesting story but definitely fiction!!! I'm pretty sure there weren't even really such tribes as "Turkmen" and "Uzbek" way back in 1500 B.C. :) Add it posthaste to BJAODN! K. Lastochka 16:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

In an earlier sighting on Wikipedia[1], Izmir Alkansur had palaces constructed in Ottoman style, so that is at least 14th century. This guy must have lived through more than 26 centuries. --Lambiam^Talk 21:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Hahahahaha we should make a legend of this Alkansur guy. Sort of a mix of Ataturk, Atilla the Hun and Turkmenbashi and lived longer than Methuselah. Priceless! K. Lastochka 17:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.