Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. —Cryptic 23:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Last Alliance

Non-notable website fails WP:WEB, WP:RS, WP:V. Article consists pretty much entirely of original research. PROD'd but removed. So much forumcruft, its ridiculous. Borderline A7. Wickethewok 17:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Must agree - everything in the world is interesting, but not to everyone. This is only interesting to the people on the board, I'd guess. "TLA has been victims of several controversial debates and crisises, but all have made TLA stronger." That sorta says "Not Wiki" to me. - Corporal Tunnel 17:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete G-11. This is spam and should be removed post-haste. The editor's contributions have only covered this website,[1] a possible violation of WP:COI. EVula 18:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Though this article is now essentially superfluous, being on twice, the site would also be of interest to any who enjoy the hobby. Several people have already found the site using the Wikipedia page and are now enjoying the community... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChrisWilliams1000 (talk • contribs).

• Wikipedia is not for attracting new users to your site. Wickethewok 19:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Why would they want more members, when they already have 8000+? I think this is more a hate campiagn. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.77.158.75 (talk • contribs).

• I assure you no one has anything personal against "The Last Alliance". Wickethewok 19:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete due to profuse cruft, if not failing WP:WEB. Sandstein 20:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.